HOLD MEN’S SPERM ACCOUNTABLE

Counterstrike: Using The Free Market To

Hold Men’s Sperm Accountable

By: Sarah JonesMarch 23, 2012

In response to the patriarchal treatment of our bodies as property, criminal defense attorney Ms. Karen Suzanne Wilkes has drafted sample legislation based upon licensing & property laws, demanding that men pay for “licensing, use and maintenance of our bodies & the offspring we create.”

Ms. Wilkes’ sample legislation reads:

It shall be unlawful (a felony, punishable by 10 years imprisonment) for any man to impregnate a woman without first obtaining and filing with the clerk of court a sworn affidavit signed by said woman, and signed by 2 witnesses, giving her express consent to be impregnated by that man. In addition, at the time of filing said affidavit, the man shall post a cash bond with the court in an amount equal to 20% of the man’s gross income for the next 18 years, thereby covering the cost of child support in the event a child is born as a result of the man’s act in impregnating the woman. The cash bond will also include an additional amount to cover the cost of all prenatal care & the cost of delivering the baby.

PETITION TO STOP THE GOP’S WAR ON WOMEN
(PLEASE SIGN LINK BELOW)

http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/simgad/9508583691476331216 

This legislation fairly shares both the burden of pregnancy and the burden of birth control and would put a swift stop to criminalizing abortion and miscarriage, as well as ceasing efforts to defund Planned Parenthood and make birth control harder to get and more expensive.

The Constitution protects property, and aren’t our bodies our property? I posited this thought to Ms. Wilkes, and she agreed, “Property is a fundamental right protected by the Constitution and cannot be taken or infringed by the State without due process of law. I think it’s fair to say that the government is infringing on a woman’s property (her body) without due process of law by forcing her to undergo (AND PAY FOR) unwanted medical procedures … not mention forcing her to carry a child & give birth against her will.”

Does it seem outrageous? Ms. Wilkes notes, “As a criminal defense lawyer and defender of freedom, liberty, the Constitution and human rights, I’m no fan of criminalizing personal activities…. However, I sure would like to counter these oppressive anti-women laws with one that puts the onus on men, just as the article suggests.”

Ms. Wilkes is referencing an article written this morning by fellow PoliticusUSA writer Hrafnkell Haraldsson. He wrote, “It is not a big step from suddenly having to treat your dog like an equal to surreal the comments of Republican State Rep. Alan Dick that women should be required to have a permission slip from the sperm’s owner before they can abort the results of its implantation. Speaking of a piece of Alaska legislation Rep. Dick (what an appropriate name) said, ‘If I thought that the man’s signature was required… required, in order for a woman to have an abortion, I’d have a little more peace about it.’”

How is this proposed legislation any more outrageous than punishing a woman for not wanting to get pregnant, getting pregnant via rape or incest, or for getting pregnant when she wasn’t ready to have a baby? It’s not. The only reason it may appear outrageous is because it inserts the government over a man’s sperm; it regulates the sperm just as they are regulating the uterus.

They are also inserting the government up our vaginal canals – literally, with state mandated transvaginal ultrasounds. They have hence already lost any government intrusion argument they might make in defense of their right over their own sperm and actions of their penis.

And I particularly like the bit about the 20% of wages for child support, because it demonstrates how smart people can use the war on women to turn the argument around and address an issue that has long needed addressing.

What can you do? Well, for starters, you can submit this suggested legislation to your state representatives. And remember, the Right is waging its war on women on the state level even more than the federal level, after discovering that it’s much harder to get their way on the federal level. You can use this knowledge to fight back on a state level.

You can send this to your state representatives and write letters to the editor in favor of it.

This is how you reframe the debate around the Constitutionality of using government to infringe upon our bodies/property. And hey, if they go for it, millions of children will finally be financially provided for by the owner of the sperm that created them and men will be forced to take responsibility for birth control.

Never just fight back against a bad argument; always reframe it by asking for something more — something that puts the burden on the other party to defend the legal premise of their own argument with something at stake for them.

It’s really the free market at work if you think about it. If we are property to be regulated and used because we can make a baby, then so is sperm. Make them pay equally for their belief and see how well that goes over.

http://www.politicususa.com/hold-mens-sperm-accountable/

ABOUT THAT GOP WAR ON WOMEN

Uterus Police

4 HORSESASSES OF THE APOCALYPSE

WOMEN ARE FIGHTING BACK!!!

GA Dems Fight Back With Anti-Vasectomy Bill!!!

From CNN:

As members of Georgia’s House of Representatives debate whether to prohibit abortions for women more than 20 weeks pregnant, House Democrats introduced their own reproductive rights plan: No more vasectomies that leave “thousands of children … deprived of birth.”

Rep. Yasmin Neal, a Democrat from the Atlanta suburb of Jonesboro, planned on Wednesday to introduce HB 1116, which would prevent men from vasectomies unless needed to avert serious injury or death.

The bill reads: “It is patently unfair that men avoid the rewards of unwanted fatherhood by presuming that their judgment over such matters is more valid than the judgment of the General Assembly. … It is the purpose of the General Assembly to assert an invasive state interest in the reproductive habits of men in this state and substitute the will of the government over the will of adult men.”

“If we legislate women’s bodies, it’s only fair that we legislate men’s,” said Neal… full story here

Complete with video… “thousands of children are deprived of birth each year because of lack of legislation…” < what a great line!

http://ozmud.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/ga-dems-fight-back-with-anti-vasectomy-bill/

Janet Howell, Virginia State Senator,
Attaches Rectal Exam Amendment
To Anti-Abortion Bill

To protest a bill that would require women to undergo an ultrasound before having an abortion, Virginia State Sen. Janet Howell (D-Fairfax) on Monday attached an amendment that would require men to have a rectal exam and a cardiac stress test before obtaining a prescription for erectile dysfunction medication.

“We need some gender equity here,” she told HuffPost. “The Virginia senate is about to pass a bill that will require a woman to have totally unnecessary medical procedure at their cost and inconvenience. If we’re going to do that to women, why not do that to men?”

The Republican-controlled senate narrowly rejected the amendment Monday by a vote of 21 to 19, but passed the mandatory ultrasound bill in a voice vote. A similar bill in Texas, which physicians say has caused a “bureaucratic nightmare,” is currently being challenged in court.

Howell said she is not surprised her amendment failed.

“This is more of a message type of an amendment, so I was pleased to get 19 votes,” she said.

She pointed out that there are only seven women in the Virginia senate, and six of them voted in favor of her amendment, along with 13 male senators. Sen. Jill Vogel (R-Fauquier County), the sponsor of the mandatory ultrasound bill, voted against it.

“I do believe that erectile dysfunction in this context is different from pregnancy,” she said on the senate floor.

The Senate will formally vote on the mandatory ultrasound bill on Tuesday.

ALSO ON HUFFPOST:

TOP LINKS ON THIS TOPIC
Texas Mandatory Ultrasound Law Still Not Going Into Effect | RH Reality Check

Pennsylvania Introduces Mandatory Ultrasound Regulations For Abortions | ThinkProgress

LGF Pages – Federal judge blocks mandatory ultrasound viewing part of NC abortion law

Mandatory-ultrasound law goes into effect today | Florida Independent

Crisis pregnancy centers enter legal fight over North Carolina mandatory ultrasound law | Florida Independent

Kentucky State Senator Reintroduces Mandatory Ultrasound Bill | RH Reality Check

Senate Committee Passes Mandatory Ultrasound Bill; How will Dorsey Ridley vote? | Barefoot and Progressive

N.C. governor vetoes mandatory-ultrasound bill | Florida Independent

Pennsylvania House Introduces Mandatory Ultrasound Bill | RH Reality Check

Activists fight injunction against N.C. mandatory ultrasound law | Florida Independent

Blog for Choice | Judge Edith Jones and Mandatory Ultrasound: A Blast from the Anti-Choice Past

Abortion Bill | abortion, bill – WPEC 12 West Palm Beach

Ignoring Objections, Federal Appeals Court Green-Lights Immediate Enforcement of Intrusive Anti-Choice Texas Law | Center for Reproductive Rights

 

AN EGG IS NOT A CHICKEN!

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!

Hey Repuglicans and bible thumping evangelical hypocrites,

try getting into the 21st century and keep your noses out of our panties.  Your era of lies, superstition, fantasy deities and the myth of male superiority is long gone so please stop trying to bring back the dark ages, witch burning and the inquisition.  Women are fed up with your bullcaca and lies and beginning to see what hell seven thousand years of  PATRIARCHY has wrought!

OLDER POSTS